Reports of the most recent meetings are available in our News Section
The Christian Effect on Jewish LifeGuest Speaker: Rabbi Dr Michael HiltonA meeting held at St Giles’ Church Hall, Ickenham, on 8th June 2005
Introduction
Rabbi Hilton commenced by saying that when his book The Christian Effect on Jewish Life came out in December 1994 he went round the country and talked to a lot of CCJ branches, but it is quite a while since he has talked about his book, and so he was very pleased to have the opportunity to review things because, as with any other area of scholarship, things do change, and there is a lot less surprise about the title now than there was 10 years ago. Ten years ago it was pretty way out to claim that Christianity had influenced what everybody thought of as the older religion. It was obvious that Judaism had influenced Christianity, but the other way round how could it be? Now it is much more generally accepted that Jews couldn’t possibly have lived in Christian lands for over 1500 years without it having some effect. To give a very simple example, the great Medieval scholar Maimonides wrote, “The custom is for all Jews in Spain and the West, in Babylon and in the Holy Land to spread out mats in the synagogue on the floor to sit on. But in the cities of Edom they don’t sit on the floor, they sit on chairs”. Now what did he mean by “the cities of Edom”? To the Rabbis it frequently meant Rome, and so here he clearly means Roman Catholic practice, i.e. Christian Europe. And the custom of providing chairs, which Maimonides said spread from Christians to Jews, was soon universally adopted by Jewish communities everywhere.
Ignore it and it will go away?
Comparing FestivalsShavuot & PentecostRabbi Hilton’s book began life in 1989 at a study session he gave at the festival of Shavuot. It was a joint study session given with Sr Margaret Shepherd, who is now the National Director of CCJ. What they decided to do was to look at the development of twin festivals, on the Christian side Pentecost, and on the Jewish side Shavuot. Rabbi Hilton then went on to discuss the development of the two festivals in some detail. He explained that as for Christians Pentecost is a time for proclaiming the Gospel, for Jews what they are celebrating is God giving them the Torah. The links between the two festivals are obvious, and the way the Jewish festival is now celebrated indicates that the celebrations of the Jewish festival has to some extent been modelled on the Christian festival.
Passover & the Last Supper
Chanukah & Christmas
Rabbi Hilton drew attention to the lighting of the Advent candles, which are lit in a very similar way to which the Chanukah candles are lit. In the States signs go up in Jewish areas saying “Happy Chanukah, Happy Christmas”. Gifts and wrapping paper are designed to suit either festival, or even both. Coloured decorations in the shape of a star or a dreidel (Chanukah top) are available which you can hang up in your home. He once received a Christmas card which showed Father Christmas and a Rabbi standing side by side. The Rabbi was holding a sack of toys, and Father Christmas the Chanukah candles. They had swapped hats but their beards were identical! Comparing ScripturesConcepts of MessiahRabbi Hilton wrote the last part of his book during a 20 week sojourn in Jamaica. While there he read his notes on another study session he had led with Fr Gordian Marshall which he referred to as Mission and Proof Texts. What they did was to take some quotes from Isaiah, ones commonly used in these days by Christian missionaries, and look at the ways the Gospels and the Rabbis had used these texts, and it was quite clear that in many instances the great Jewish medieval commentators on the Bible were directly answering Christian claims. Texts which in Christian tradition, particularly those from Isaiah, which were taken to refer to a future Messiah, were interpreted by the medieval Jewish scholars as referring to Israel’s own time, and it also became clear that many of these texts are avoided in the cycle of synagogue readings, probably deliberately. What has happened is that the medieval debate/polemics has made us face the fact that Jews and Christians are divided even over the commonly held Hebrew Scriptures. In 1991 a very unholy row broke out in the Jewish world. All over Israel posters went up proclaiming the message “Prepare for the coming of the Messiah”. In England and America children were asking if the Messiah was on his way. The posters and publicity came from a group which is commonly known as Lubavitch. They were proclaiming that their Rebbe, the then 89 year old Menachem Mendel Schneerson was about to announce that he was the Messiah. When he died in June 1994 it made headlines across the world. Many of the reports highlighted the messianic fervour of his followers. A few of his followers danced and sang instead of mourning, confident of their leader’s return from the dead. The resurrection of the dead is a cardinal Jewish principle, they argued, so why not a Messiah who came back from the dead? But in fact there is no precedent in Judaism for such a belief; it is an obvious borrowing from Christianity. The British newspaper The Independent used the headline “Tears flow as the Second Coming is Postponed”. There is no doctrine of that Second Coming in Judaism, and yet the paper seemed to think it described the attitude of this particular Jewish group. It is apparent that the difference in Messianic beliefs can be regarded as the classic distinction between Judaism and Christianity. It is taught in schools and colleges everywhere. We like to live with that simple point of view. Christians are the ones who believe the Messiah has already come, while Jews are still waiting. Rabbi Hilton’s argument, which he expounds in his book, is that the doctrine of the Messiah is not in fact a central doctrine of either Judaism or Christianity, but has been kept alive by centuries of debate between the two faiths. (Some in the audience were rather surprised by this “downplaying” of the concept of a Messiah and this was reflected in some of the questions which were raised following his talk). Other InfluencesTitles and TrendsChristian influences on Judaism in modern times include architecture, and some aspects of Hasidic, Orthodox and Reform Judaism. The Hasidic have a doctrine which is similar to that of sainthood in Christianity. The United Synagogue in England is modelled directly on the established Church of England, with a central organisation owning all the buildings and appointing the Rabbis. In the second half of the 19th Century only the Chief Rabbi was allowed to use the title “Rabbi”. All other Jewish ministers were called by the Christian term “Reverend”. They often wore clerical collars and would put on robes before the service in a room they called the Vestry, possibly with the assistance of Wardens, all terms borrowed from the Church. Also, just as the trend in Victorian times was to larger and larger churches, so the established Synagogue favoured larger and larger Synagogues.
Organisation and Leadership Roles
Rites and Ceremonies
The custom of lighting candles for the dead in the place of worship is clearly borrowed from the Church. It was a time when Masses for the dead were a very popular part of Catholic tradition. The rabbis linked the lighting of candles to the verse from Proverbs ”The soul of man is the lamp of the Lord”, thus assimilating it to the Jewish tradition. This doesn’t disguise the obvious borrowing from the Catholic Church. Sabbath candles which are lit on Friday nights were borrowed from the Church in the Middle Ages. Originally two were lit, as was the custom of two candles on the altar. Then, as the use of candles used in Christian worship with processions etc increased, so the number of Sabbath candles increased. ConclusionsRabbi Hilton said that the examples he had given so far were only a little taster of what he has included in his book. Why was it that the Christian influence was for so long an unwritten and unspoken part of Judaism? Why has it never been admitted? He had received responses from the Orthodox, but while they acknowledged that Christian practices had influenced Liberal and Reform Judaism, they denied that it had affected them.Part of the answer clearly lies in the history of hostility between Jews and Christians. Each shaped its theology in a way different from the other. Each developed practices to highlight the differences. At the same time, as part of the process, each was exercising a subtle influence on each other’s responses. The paths of the two faiths could never come together because the distinctive features of each would be lost, but neither could they go too far apart, because then there would be no grounds for debate and comparison. And this has very important implications for the way we understand our Jewish/Christian dialogue today. Too often, even now, dialogue consists of Jews explaining to Christians features of Jewish life, which Christians enjoy because they feel they are learning something of their own history and roots. Jews normally express little or no interest in features of Christian life which are part of their history. Much interfaith dialogue helps to preserve the myth that the Judaism of ancient times has continued virtually unchanged. But that is not true: once Jews acknowledge a Christian influence more openly, they will have a clearer understanding of how they can relate to Christians in a pluralist society. And in that way Jews and Christians can meet as equals. Rabbi Hilton concluded his most interesting talk by expressing the hope that God will guide future discussions between the two faiths. - Bernard Tiley |
Join Now |
News |
Visitors' Book |
What's On |
Who's Who